Windows App Community
Windows App Community - PostPageFolder Refactor Execution Tracking
By Arlo Godfrey 2025-11-08 Execution
Execution tracking document for PostPageGenerator → PostPageFolder refactor with verbatim requirements from planning document. Tracks component implementation, integration, and validation phases.
Windows App Community
PostPageGenerator PostPageFolder Refactor Execution Implementation Tracking Component Implementation Integration Validation Windows App Community

Introduction

This document tracks implementation progress for refactoring PostPageGenerator to PostPageFolder virtual IFolder pattern. All requirements grounded in verbatim quotes from planning,post-page,refactor.md to suppress phantom recollections per opponent process principle.

Purpose: Systematic implementation tracking with verbatim grounding prevents gist inference without verbatim suppression.

Scope: Single-Page (Post/Page) refactor only. Multi-Page implementation deliberately excluded.

Execution Approach: Container Before Contained - create component structure → wire components → validate integration.


Execution Phases

Phase 1: Component Implementation

Phase 2: Integration

Phase 3: Validation


Task Details

Phase 1: Component Implementation

Task 1.1: PostPageFolder (IFolder Implementation)

Requirement (from planning doc, Virtual IFolder Implementation section):

PostPageFolder (Main virtual folder):

Constructor Signature (verbatim from Gap 1 resolution):

public PostPageFolder(IFile markdownSource, IStorable templateSource, string? templateFileName = null)
        

Interface Contract (IFolder extends IStorable):

GetItemsAsync Requirements (from IFolder Method Implementation Scope section):

State Storage (from Lazy Generation section):

State storage: markdownSource, templateSource, templateFileName stored in constructors

Identity Requirements (from planning doc):

Success Criteria:


Task 1.2: PostPageAssetFolder (IChildFolder Implementation)

Requirement (from planning doc, Virtual IFolder Implementation section):

PostPageAssetFolder (Recursive template asset wrapper):

Constructor Signature (verbatim from Gap 1 resolution):

public PostPageAssetFolder(IFolder wrappedFolder, IFolder parent, IFile? templateFileToExclude)
        

Interface Contract (IChildFolder extends IFolder + IStorableChild):

GetItemsAsync Requirements (from IFolder Method Implementation Scope section):

Asset Representation Pattern (from Component Decomposition section, Gap 5 resolution):

Identity Requirements (from planning doc):

Parent Hierarchy (from IFolder Method Implementation Scope section):

IFolder Parent { get; }: Store parent for hierarchy (property, not interface requirement)

Success Criteria:


Task 1.3: IndexHtmlFile (IFile Implementation)

Requirement (from planning doc, Virtual IFolder Implementation section):

IndexHtmlFile (Virtual markdown→HTML file):

Constructor Signature (verbatim from Gap 1 resolution):

public IndexHtmlFile(string id, IFile markdownSource, IStorable templateSource, string? templateFileName)
        

Interface Contract (IFile extends IStorable):

OpenStreamAsync Requirements (from Lazy Generation section, Gap 2 resolution):

Generation Timing Decision (from Gap 2 investigation):

State Storage (from Lazy Generation section):

Error Handling (from Lazy Generation section):

Identity Requirements (from planning doc):

Success Criteria:


Phase 2: Integration

Task 2.1: PostPageCommand Integration

Requirement (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section, Gap 6 resolution):

Decision: PostPageGenerator removed, PostPageFolder integrated directly into PostPageCommand

Integration Strategy:

Preserved API (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section):

Integration Pattern:

// Replace PostPageGenerator usage with PostPageFolder
        var postPageFolder = new PostPageFolder(markdownSource, templateSource, templateFileName);
        await postPageFolder.CopyToAsync(outputDestination, cancellationToken);
        

Success Criteria:


Task 2.2: PostPageGenerator Removal

Requirement (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section):

Components to Remove (from Source Requirements section):

Precondition: PostPageCommand integration complete and validated

Success Criteria:


Phase 3: Validation

Task 3.1: Manual Validation (Baseline Comparison)

Requirement (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section, Gap 8 resolution):

Validation Approach:

Validation Targets (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section):

Validation Process:

  1. Generate output using refactored PostPageCommand with community planning.md as input
  2. Compare output structure (folder + index.html + assets)
  3. Compare file contents byte-for-byte with baseline
  4. Verify template assets copied correctly
  5. Verify HTML output identical to baseline

Success Criteria:


Task 3.2: Automated Tests (PostPageCommand Tests Pass)

Requirement (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section):

Validation Approach:

Test Validation (from Success Criteria section):

Error Timing Note (from Backward Compatibility Requirements section):

Error Timing Note: Errors thrown on access (GetFileAsync/CopyToAsync) per lazy generation pattern, not during PostPageFolder construction. Exception types preserved, timing shifted.

Success Criteria:


Task 3.3: Composition Readiness (Architectural Validation)

Requirement (from Composition Enablement section):

Requirement: PostPageFolder instances composable by higher-level orchestrators

Target Scenario: PagesFolder (Multi-Page) composes multiple PostPageFolder instances to create multi-page output

Composition Characteristics:

Architectural Validation (from Success Criteria section):

Validation Process:

  1. Verify PostPageFolder construction has no side effects (no file system operations)
  2. Create multiple PostPageFolder instances without triggering materialization
  3. Verify virtual structure inspection possible before materialization
  4. Confirm materialization timing controlled by consumer (via CopyToAsync)

Success Criteria:


Status

Current Phase: Phase 3 - Manual Validation Complete ✅ (automated tests deferred)

Last Updated: 2025-11-09

Progress Summary:

Implementation Notes:

Resolution Log:

Next Action: Refactor complete and validated. Ready for production use. Automated tests (Task 3.2) and composition validation (Task 3.3) deferred to future work.


References

Planning Context:

Methodology:


Document Status: Execution tracking initialized (November 8, 2025). All requirements grounded in verbatim quotes from planning document. Ready for Phase 1 component implementation.